<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for K. Tempest Bradford</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tempest.fluidartist.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tempest.fluidartist.com</link>
	<description>Between Boundaries</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Magazines That Want (More) Diversity by Ashok Banker</title>
		<link>http://tempest.fluidartist.com/2008/07/16/magazines-that-want-more-diversity/#comment-7308</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashok Banker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tempest.fluidartist.com/?p=153#comment-7308</guid>
		<description>When you say POC does that include POC from other countries, non-US countries? I don't think so. Writers who aren't based in the US or aren't visiting cons there and sucking up to editors at such events--a major qualification for SFF writers of all colours, it seems--just don't feel welcome at virtually all US SFF publications.

John Klima makes the same point when he says that if a publication hasn't already been publishing diversity, why would that writer try that market? Vandermeer's claim that a forthcoming issue focusses on 'international' writers itself confirms this unofficial 'policy'. If 'international writers' were indeed welcome at WT, then why segregate them into a separate issue? Why not simply publish the best selection from all submissions without bothering about nationality? 

I no longer even bother to submit material, whether short-length or book-length to US publishers. What's the point? Each time I read a blogpost like this it only serves to remind how tough it is for even POC within the US to get published. What chance to POC from other countries have? 

As one editor of a fantasy magazine (not one mentioned above) brightly put it to me: "The characters are memorable, the story is taut and interesting, the setting is original...This a good SF story. But why would I want to publish a story by you that could have been written by any American writer?" Why, indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you say POC does that include POC from other countries, non-US countries? I don&#8217;t think so. Writers who aren&#8217;t based in the US or aren&#8217;t visiting cons there and sucking up to editors at such events&#8211;a major qualification for SFF writers of all colours, it seems&#8211;just don&#8217;t feel welcome at virtually all US SFF publications.</p>
<p>John Klima makes the same point when he says that if a publication hasn&#8217;t already been publishing diversity, why would that writer try that market? Vandermeer&#8217;s claim that a forthcoming issue focusses on &#8216;international&#8217; writers itself confirms this unofficial &#8216;policy&#8217;. If &#8216;international writers&#8217; were indeed welcome at WT, then why segregate them into a separate issue? Why not simply publish the best selection from all submissions without bothering about nationality? </p>
<p>I no longer even bother to submit material, whether short-length or book-length to US publishers. What&#8217;s the point? Each time I read a blogpost like this it only serves to remind how tough it is for even POC within the US to get published. What chance to POC from other countries have? </p>
<p>As one editor of a fantasy magazine (not one mentioned above) brightly put it to me: &#8220;The characters are memorable, the story is taut and interesting, the setting is original&#8230;This a good SF story. But why would I want to publish a story by you that could have been written by any American writer?&#8221; Why, indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Magazines That Want (More) Diversity by Matt&#8217;s Bookosphere 7/22/08 &#171; Enter the Octopus</title>
		<link>http://tempest.fluidartist.com/2008/07/16/magazines-that-want-more-diversity/#comment-7270</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt&#8217;s Bookosphere 7/22/08 &#171; Enter the Octopus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tempest.fluidartist.com/?p=153#comment-7270</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Weird Tales&#8221; and other Magazines that want more author diversity [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] &#8220;Weird Tales&#8221; and other Magazines that want more author diversity [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Magazines That Want (More) Diversity by Amal El-Mohtar</title>
		<link>http://tempest.fluidartist.com/2008/07/16/magazines-that-want-more-diversity/#comment-7234</link>
		<dc:creator>Amal El-Mohtar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tempest.fluidartist.com/?p=153#comment-7234</guid>
		<description>I don't know if you'd put an all-poetry 'zine on your list, but we at &lt;a href="http://www.goblinfruit.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Goblin Fruit&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; are most definitely fans of diversity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if you&#8217;d put an all-poetry &#8216;zine on your list, but we at <a href="http://www.goblinfruit.net" rel="nofollow"><i>Goblin Fruit</i></a> are most definitely fans of diversity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Magazines That Want (More) Diversity by Diversity: UR Doin&#8217; It Right at K. Tempest Bradford</title>
		<link>http://tempest.fluidartist.com/2008/07/16/magazines-that-want-more-diversity/#comment-7229</link>
		<dc:creator>Diversity: UR Doin&#8217; It Right at K. Tempest Bradford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tempest.fluidartist.com/?p=153#comment-7229</guid>
		<description>[...] looking for submissions from POC or with POC characters and/or more diverse settings and cultues is growing.  There are some great comments from editors about the issue, too.  Keep linking to the original [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] looking for submissions from POC or with POC characters and/or more diverse settings and cultues is growing.  There are some great comments from editors about the issue, too.  Keep linking to the original [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on William Sanders, You Stay Classy! by Summary of a Train Wreck: Helix Speculative Fiction Magazine&#8217;s Sordid Bigotry and Blunders : Spontaneous Derivation</title>
		<link>http://tempest.fluidartist.com/2008/07/15/william-sanders-you-stay-classy/#comment-7184</link>
		<dc:creator>Summary of a Train Wreck: Helix Speculative Fiction Magazine&#8217;s Sordid Bigotry and Blunders : Spontaneous Derivation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 19:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tempest.fluidartist.com/?p=151#comment-7184</guid>
		<description>[...] K. Tempest Bradford notes, very [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] K. Tempest Bradford notes, very [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Almost Everything I&#8217;ve Ever Wanted To Say To Atheists by Samuel Tinianow</title>
		<link>http://tempest.fluidartist.com/2008/07/17/almost-everything-ive-ever-wanted-to-say-to-atheists/#comment-7180</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel Tinianow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tempest.fluidartist.com/?p=156#comment-7180</guid>
		<description>Out of the people I know, it's been my observation that the ones who are religious tend *on average* to be less open to accept other's beliefs, less open-minded about their own religion, and more offensive when someone else questions them. However, most of them don't go looking for a fight with other (non)religious groups and are content to do the bulk of their declaiming within their own circle.

People I've known who are atheists, and who are very closed-minded about it, have tended to be much more active. Out of all the religious missonaries and recruiters I've been approached by, especially in recent years, the majority have been atheists, and they have tended to be more rude, more intrusive, and more personally demeaning than any other group on the whole--and that tally includes the time I got invited to a "movie night" that turned out to be a recruitment session for Xenos Christian Fellowship in disguise. 

(Error analysis: I was a student at Emerson College within the past 5 years, which may be affecting my count)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of the people I know, it&#8217;s been my observation that the ones who are religious tend *on average* to be less open to accept other&#8217;s beliefs, less open-minded about their own religion, and more offensive when someone else questions them. However, most of them don&#8217;t go looking for a fight with other (non)religious groups and are content to do the bulk of their declaiming within their own circle.</p>
<p>People I&#8217;ve known who are atheists, and who are very closed-minded about it, have tended to be much more active. Out of all the religious missonaries and recruiters I&#8217;ve been approached by, especially in recent years, the majority have been atheists, and they have tended to be more rude, more intrusive, and more personally demeaning than any other group on the whole&#8211;and that tally includes the time I got invited to a &#8220;movie night&#8221; that turned out to be a recruitment session for Xenos Christian Fellowship in disguise. </p>
<p>(Error analysis: I was a student at Emerson College within the past 5 years, which may be affecting my count)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Almost Everything I&#8217;ve Ever Wanted To Say To Atheists by Matt&#8217;s Bookosphere 7/18/8 &#171; Enter the Octopus</title>
		<link>http://tempest.fluidartist.com/2008/07/17/almost-everything-ive-ever-wanted-to-say-to-atheists/#comment-7157</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt&#8217;s Bookosphere 7/18/8 &#171; Enter the Octopus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 01:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tempest.fluidartist.com/?p=156#comment-7157</guid>
		<description>[...] K. Tempest Bradford: &#8220;Focusing on the stupidest among those with whom you disagree is a sign o... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] K. Tempest Bradford: &#8220;Focusing on the stupidest among those with whom you disagree is a sign o&#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Election Fundraising XKCD Style by Alis</title>
		<link>http://tempest.fluidartist.com/2008/07/17/election-fundraising-xkcd-style/#comment-7151</link>
		<dc:creator>Alis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 21:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tempest.fluidartist.com/?p=154#comment-7151</guid>
		<description>It's up to 4101 as of this time stamp (counting me, now). Thanks so much for the heads-up.  Great comic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s up to 4101 as of this time stamp (counting me, now). Thanks so much for the heads-up.  Great comic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Almost Everything I&#8217;ve Ever Wanted To Say To Atheists by Matt Smit</title>
		<link>http://tempest.fluidartist.com/2008/07/17/almost-everything-ive-ever-wanted-to-say-to-atheists/#comment-7150</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Smit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 21:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tempest.fluidartist.com/?p=156#comment-7150</guid>
		<description>I couldn't agree with you more.  I also want to note that I don't agree with many of the above commenters that Christians are more likely to be snobby/offensive about religion than atheists- I think, in terms of sheer numbers, that there are more offensive Christians, and that they tend to get more public airtime and attention due to their privileged status, but proportionally, I find that snobbery is spread about equally regardless of religious affiliation (or lack thereof).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more.  I also want to note that I don&#8217;t agree with many of the above commenters that Christians are more likely to be snobby/offensive about religion than atheists- I think, in terms of sheer numbers, that there are more offensive Christians, and that they tend to get more public airtime and attention due to their privileged status, but proportionally, I find that snobbery is spread about equally regardless of religious affiliation (or lack thereof).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I Have The Power! by Luke Jackson</title>
		<link>http://tempest.fluidartist.com/2008/07/18/i-have-the-power/#comment-7142</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tempest.fluidartist.com/?p=158#comment-7142</guid>
		<description>Bloggasm has covered the William Sanders issue now:

http://bloggasm.com/the-ethics-of-hate-mail-should-bloggers-post-email-correspondence-without-permission</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bloggasm has covered the William Sanders issue now:</p>
<p><a href="http://bloggasm.com/the-ethics-of-hate-mail-should-bloggers-post-email-correspondence-without-permission" rel="nofollow">http://bloggasm.com/the-ethics-of-hate-mail-should-bloggers-post-email-correspondence-without-permission</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
